@REdOG@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish • 1 year agoDear Red Hat: Are you dumb?www.jeffgeerling.commessage-square120fedilinkarrow-up1299arrow-down110cross-posted to: foss@beehaw.orgtechnology@lemmy.mllinux@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up1289arrow-down1external-linkDear Red Hat: Are you dumb?www.jeffgeerling.com@REdOG@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square120fedilinkcross-posted to: foss@beehaw.orgtechnology@lemmy.mllinux@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squareThe_PetelinkfedilinkEnglish5•1 year agoAdditionally, they have to release sources for the projects but not necessarily for things like the spec files or the rpms. Here’s the source for the kernel . . . . Thanks I can get that from kernel.org It’s the part that’s not GPL that’s the value add here.
minus-square@aport@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglish4•1 year agoBuild scripts are absolutely required by the GPL
Additionally, they have to release sources for the projects but not necessarily for things like the spec files or the rpms.
Here’s the source for the kernel . . . .
Thanks I can get that from kernel.org
It’s the part that’s not GPL that’s the value add here.
Build scripts are absolutely required by the GPL